Les Cercles Mégalithiques en SénéGambie The Senegambian Stone Circles

Text & Photos Momodou Camara

The Circles are composed of standing stones between ten and twenty four in any particular circle. One of the The stones at Kerr Batch striking feature is that almost all the stones forming a given circle are of the same height and size. Their height above the ground varying between two hundred and forty five (245cm) centimeters and sixty centimeters (60cm). The diameter is from thirty centimeters (30cm) to one hundred centimeters (100cm).

The largest stones which are at N'jai Kunda must weigh about ten tons each. They were brought down a steep hillside and their transportation on rollers or on hammocks must have presented formidable difficulties and have required a considerable labor force.

The stone circles at Wassu

As a results of Laboratory tests at the University of Dakar, the date of the sample was found to be from 750 A.D plus or minus 110 years.
The stones were cut out of laterite (" a cementation of ferruginous sandstone ") that occurs in large outcrops in this region. It is a feature of this stone that it hardens upon exposure to the air, and that prior to such exposure it is relatively easy to quarry. Wasu

Where several circles are found on the same site the exterior stones form a continuos line as at Wassu. Clearly there is much work to be done in carefully surveying these extensive monuments, both in precisely locating them on maps and measuring them in detail.

One of the circles in Kerr Batch

A lot of explanations have been given about the shape of the Senegambia Stone Circles by Islamic historians and wise observers.

One of such explanations was revealed by the late Alhaji Kemoring Jaiteh a well known Islamic scholar of Kuntaur Fulla Kunda in Niani. According to his writings, if a small stone stands near a large one, that shows that, some one was buried with his/her child. Similarly, if the stones are V-shape, that pictures that two close relatives died on the same day and were buried together. One of the circles in Kerr Batch

The circles are said to be built around mounds of kings and chiefs, in the same way as royal persons were buried in the ancient empire of Ghana.

Once Islam was brought into Senegambia in the 11th century, devout Muslims especially the "Karamos" were also buried in the same way. Consequently, some of these Circles became holy places.

Today, small stones and vegetables like tomatoes are still left on the stones. Some of these stones are said to shine bright at night.

Danish students visiting the Stone Circles of Wasu

Danish students visiting the Stone Circles of Wasu in November 2000

The Wasu Stone Circles are said to be visited by hundreds of people annually and all-year-around and by classes of people: students, geologists, historians, archeologists and tourists.

A new museum situated at the "Stone Circles" in Wassu Central River Division was inaugurated on Saturday May 27th 2000. According to a press release issued by the National Council for Arts and Culture, the museum is the first of its kind in the Senegambia region which seeks to interpret the "Stone Circle" puzzle. The Wassu museum is seen as a major success for the Council in its drive to decentralise its services and preserve the Gambia's cultural heritage. The release says that work on the building was completed through the financial assistance from UNESCO and technical support from APSO, an Irish Voluntary Organisation.

Danish students visiting the Stone Circles of Kerr Batch in February 2003

VOIR LES PHOTOS

The following is an extract from an article "Megaliths in the Senegambia" that appeared in The Lay Hunter in the late 1970s

APPENDIX: Paul Devereux.
Experiments with the Ker-Batch group.

Having the plan of Ker-Batch to hand, I thought it might prove worthwhile to look at the circles in the light of experience gained on the UK field-trip. We discovered that edge alignment was the rule, and centre alignment stood out as more of an exception. Watkins also noted this with respect to mounds, roads and circles. He pointed out that the apparently disparately placed circles at Stanton Drew, for example, had their common line running through their eastern edges. (There are also, though, some interesting centre alignments at the site as well.)

At Ker-Batch, preliminary work soon showed that there was no apparently meaningful central alignments, so edge alignment was concentrated on. What follows is subject to the accuracy of the plan available and the restrictions of attempting geometry at the scale of the plan copy available; so it is all slightly `rough and ready' but enough to show, I think, that the circles are not so randomly laid out as might appear. I would need a lot of convincing that the underlying geometry is pure chance.

Investigation suggested the following features. Alignment AC touching the northernmost stones of circles I, II, III and VI. Alignments AF and BG touching circles II, VIII and IX on their southern and northern edges respectively, and AF touches the northern side only of I. AF and BG are parallel. AF and AC meet at the same stone in circle I. An alignment through the eastern edges of circles VIII and VII extends northerly to C and cuts BG in the southwest at D and AF at E. Both D and E are rightangles. Alignment BG not only touches the northern edges of II, VIII and IX but also the end stones of curved lines east of IX and VIII and the southwest stone of the straight row between circles IV and V. Taking this last point as J, and producing a line from there to pass between the two stone outliers between circles VI and VII to cut EC at H, a Pythagorean triangle JHD is formed. The direction of JH is also indicated by another stone next to the one at J. Supporting structure for this geometry might possibly exist in that a line from the stone at B in circle II produced through the extreme northeast stone of the straight row and through the Cup stone and Lyre stone also meets EC at H. Alignments to opposing edges of circles

VI and VII cross at the southern stone of the two outliers which is touched by JH. I do not suggest that this is the full extent of the implied geometry.

I'm sorry that all that is a bit indigestible, but space forces me to compress the description of the diagram presented. But parallel lines, right angles, edge alignments affecting up to half the circles of the group, and 3-4-5 triangles do not occur by chance in a group of 8 circles in my opinion. And when clearly constructed stone rows play important roles in such implied geometric schemes, it is my view that intention cannot be doubted. To the question `But why would they do it?' I can only say that I can't explain the mesh of lines at Nasca either, or the Bolivian lines, or the Dartmoor stone rows, and so on!